Defined scope
Document the brand, competitors, engines, topics, intents, period, and market before measuring.
Fihrist methodology
Fihrist compares like with like, keeps the evidence attached, and never presents one changing answer as a universal truth.

Fihrist begins with a defined brand, market, competitor set, topic scope, and buyer intent. Answers are retained at engine and question level. Rates keep their sample context, and repeated measurement is used to separate a meaningful pattern from ordinary output variation.
A screenshot can be useful evidence, but it is not a market-wide conclusion. Reliable interpretation depends on comparable prompts, declared scope, retained answers, sample context, and honest confidence language.
Document the brand, competitors, engines, topics, intents, period, and market before measuring.
Use the same evaluation frame when comparing brands and engines.
Keep the response, mention, recommendation, and source behind every finding.
Show sample context and limitations instead of false precision.
Agree on the brand, competitors, audience, and measurement boundaries before measurement begins.
Run the same buyer questions across the same AI engines, with every finding linked to the answer behind it.
Turn the findings that matter into source, content, brand, or technical priorities, then measure again.
Models are probabilistic and their systems, sources, and context change. Variation is expected and must be reflected in interpretation.
No. It is an observable indicator within a defined answer set, not a direct revenue attribution model.
By retaining evidence, stating scope and sample context, repeating comparable measurements, and qualifying findings that are not stable.
Request early access. We will help you define the market, competitors, and buyer questions worth measuring.
Request early access