Evidence-backed gaps
Trace every content opportunity to an observed answer, source, or competitor pattern.
Content opportunities
Turn missing topics, claims, and proof into content priorities your team can act on with confidence.

Fihrist connects content planning to observable gaps in AI answers. Instead of producing another generic topic list, it shows the questions where your brand is absent, the evidence supporting competitors, and the kind of content your team should consider next.
Without evidence, teams can publish at volume while leaving the real decision questions unanswered. The opportunity should explain both what is missing and why it matters.
Trace every content opportunity to an observed answer, source, or competitor pattern.
Prioritize potential briefs by buyer intent, competitive gap, and expected value.
Choose comparison, guide, proof, FAQ, or entity content based on the need.
Repeat the measurement after publication to see whether visibility changed.
Agree on the brand, competitors, audience, and content opportunities before measurement begins.
Run the same buyer questions across the same AI engines, with every finding linked to the answer behind it.
Turn the findings that matter into source, content, brand, or technical priorities, then measure again.
Fihrist currently identifies and prioritizes the evidence behind content opportunities. Automated briefs and drafts are part of the product direction, but are not included in current early access. Your team remains responsible for expertise, accuracy, and publication.
No. Original expertise, useful evidence, and editorial quality matter more than the tool used to draft.
By buyer intent, observed competitive gap, evidence quality, feasibility, and likely business value.
Request early access. We will help you define the market, competitors, and buyer questions worth measuring.
Request early access